Glossary

War exclusion

A clause removing losses caused by war, military action and similar hostilities, which cyber policies now stretch to attacks backed by a nation-state.

Also called: war and military action exclusion, warlike action exclusion, state-backed cyber attack exclusion, hostile or warlike action

Nearly every property and liability policy excludes loss from war, whether declared or not, along with warlike action by a military force, insurrection, rebellion and revolution. The ISO special form (CP 10 30) lists it with other large-scale perils the market cannot price, because a war loss would hit many insureds at once.

Cyber attacks made the clause contested. Merck's property insurers cited a hostile or warlike action exclusion against its losses from NotPetya, malware widely attributed to Russia. In May 2023 the New Jersey Appellate Division held that the exclusion did not apply (Merck v. ACE American), and the insurers settled in January 2024 before the state supreme court could rule.

The market responded by rewriting the exclusion. Lloyd's Market Bulletin Y5381 (August 2022) required stand-alone cyber policies written at Lloyd's from March 31, 2023 to exclude war and state-backed attacks that significantly impair a state's functioning or security, and other insurers adopted similar clauses. Open questions follow: who attributes an attack to a state, how "significant impairment" is judged, and whether collateral damage to systems outside the affected state is excluded. Negotiate a carve-back for collateral damage and have the wording reviewed before binding. Terrorism is handled separately; see Terrorism Risk Insurance Act. The guide on war and state-backed attack exclusions in cyber policies compares the common wordings, and the exclusion entry explains how exclusions are read.

Last reviewed October 10, 2026

In the index now

Related terms

Related guides